[mb-users] bad puid

[Wendell Hicken]

On 10/6/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> But I continued my investigations and I checked the second track's PUIDs.
> Now I am quite confused (and/or worried!) There seem to be a lot of
> collisions in the PUIDs (or did I accidentally stumble on a coincidence?) Is
> this expected? If so, shouldn't Picard use PUID+duration instead of PUID
> alone?


I'm not sure where the data in the MusicBrainz db is coming from in this
case, but  PUIDs are already
accounting for duration - no tracks that are farther apart than 10 seconds
should ever have the same
PUID.  (In other words, probably the original connection was borked).

I know there were some bogus PUID connections from the original pass, and
AFAIK they are still pending
scrubbing - this may be one of those.

Wendell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20061006/a4ad1374/attachment.htm