[mb-users] bad puid

Jan van Thiel zout at gewis.nl
Fri Oct 6 14:18:31 UTC 2006


On 10/6/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
> But I continued my investigations and I checked the second track's PUIDs.
> Now I am quite confused (and/or worried!) There seem to be a lot of
> collisions in the PUIDs (or did I accidentally stumble on a coincidence?) Is
> this expected? If so, shouldn't Picard use PUID+duration instead of PUID
> alone?

A lot of people don't bother to check the track listing of a release,
they'll just select the first  one with the name they're looking for.
This happens quite a lot, no need to be worried, we just have to
cleanup using http://www.mb.inhouse.co.uk/reports/generated/DuplicatePUIDsPerAlbum/
.

I've checked and cleaned up (where necessary) all PUIDs for the 3 OVO
releases in the database.

Jan



More information about the MusicBrainz-users mailing list