[mb-users] bad puid

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2006/10/6, Jan van Thiel <zout at gewis.nl>:
>
> On 10/6/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But I continued my investigations and I checked the second track's
> PUIDs.
> > Now I am quite confused (and/or worried!) There seem to be a lot of
> > collisions in the PUIDs (or did I accidentally stumble on a
> coincidence?) Is
> > this expected? If so, shouldn't Picard use PUID+duration instead of PUID
> > alone?
>
> A lot of people don't bother to check the track listing of a release,
> they'll just select the first  one with the name they're looking for.
> This happens quite a lot, no need to be worried, we just have to
> cleanup using
> http://www.mb.inhouse.co.uk/reports/generated/DuplicatePUIDsPerAlbum/
> .
>
> I've checked and cleaned up (where necessary) all PUIDs for the 3 OVO
> releases in the database.
>
> Jan
>

Aha! ok, at least we can track the problems. I feel relieved :-)

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20061006/2cbb2ca7/attachment.htm