[mb-users] Bootlegs are not illegal

[Jason Bouwmeester]

Heh wasn't implying that it did... just an article that covers both
sides of the spectrum. Just thought it was interesting is all.

~jb

On 10/17/06, Brian G <brian at gurtler.net> wrote:
>
> that article has nothing to do with MusicBrainz Bootleg release types.
> also.. try reading the entire wikipedia article
> i suggest starting with
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootleg_recording#Authorized_live_bootlegs
> and don't forget that i had just said "(perhaps the Release Type should be
> renamed to something more appropriate)"
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
>
>
> Haeretik wrote:
> >
> >> i overlooked this part of your email.
> >> Not all bootlegs (as in release type) are illegal! Many bands thrive from
> >> and wouldn't exist if people didn't make bootleg recordings from their
> >> live
> >> performances. In fact, lots of bands (more than you'd think!) allow
> >> taping
> >> of live performances.
> >> please do not associate the term bootleg (as in release type) with
> >> illegal.
> >> (perhaps the Release Type should be renamed to something more
> >> appropriate)
> >
> >>
> >> -Brian
> >> Age Bosma wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > There's not much that can be done about this problem. They are bootlegs
> >> > and there for by definition illegal recordings.
> >> >
> >
> > I hate to be the devil's advocate...
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootleg_recording.
> >
> > ~jb/haeretik
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> > MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bootleg-DiscIDs-tf2456935s2885.html#a6867515
> Sent from the Musicbrainz - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>