[mb-users] Some release attributes shouldn't be affected by data quality

[Bogdan Butnaru]

On 7/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/7/2, Jugdish <jugdizh at gmail.com>:
> > So what I propose is that certain aspects of releases *not* be
> > affected by the release quality, namely anything that could
> > conceivably be added in the future. I think the data quality system
> > would be utilized a lot more (certainly by me!) as a result.
> >
>
> What about saying that Data Quality affects Modify and Delete edits but not
> Add edits? This is just an idea, I probably missed some implications, but it
> should be rather easy to implement, and quite easy to understand for users.

My thoughts exactly. I'm sure some of the "add" edits should still be
under the "harder-to-change" rules, but other than that it's a good
point.

We could probably go through all edit types and see which are subject
to change at any point and which should be constant for a release.

-- Bogdan Butnaru — bogdanb at gmail.com
"I think I am a fallen star, I should wish on myself." – O.