[mb-users] Artist {guest} performed Track AR, why isn't anyone
using it?
artysmokes
artysmokes at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Oct 21 14:51:00 UTC 2007
Philip Jägenstedt-3 wrote:
>
> It also very seldom see the "performed {vocal}" or "performed
> {instrument}" AR used, could it be that there is collective insecurity
> about what is the proper use so that everyone simply enters "performed"
> ARs?
>
This is one of my many betes noires. I'm not sure if many ARs were set up
before the additional type (e.g. vocal/instrument) were available, or if it
is just laziness on the part of editors, but I often make bulk edits to add
the specifics, usually with "Performed guest vocal" being used, as leaving
things as "was performed by..." often looks wrong for tracks that merely
feature a rapper or backing vocalist.
I hope your post serves as a reminder to editors to tick the relevant boxes
when adding such edits. :)
--
Cheers, Arty
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Artist-%7Bguest%7D-performed-Track-AR%2C-why-isn%27t-anyone-using-it--tf4665601s2885.html#a13329255
Sent from the Musicbrainz - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the MusicBrainz-users
mailing list