[mb-users] Clean vs. Explicit versions

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2007/10/23, Jason Bouwmeester <jbouwmeester at gmail.com>:
>
> Just curious what the protocol was for Clean/Explicit versions of albums.
> I'm adding this one in:
>
> http://www.kochdistribution.com/catalog/AudioInfo.aspx?number=KOC-CD-5929
>
> But there is also:
> http://www.kochdistribution.com/catalog/AudioInfo.aspx?number=KOC-CD-5930
>
> I was only going to add one but they have different catalog numbers. I did
> a search on 2Pac on the MB site (which is slow as molasses right now) and
> noticed there are two entries for the first volume:
>
> Nu-Mixx Klazzics
> Nu-Nixx Klassics (clean) - I am changing the title on this one to the
> proper one
>
> As far as I can tell on volume 2, the track listing is the same, but I
> cannot attest to track lengths on both releases. Is it acceptable to double
> enter them and have the titles as such:
>
> Nu Mixx Klazzics Vol. 2 (Evolution: Duets And Remixes) (explicit version)
> Nu Mixx Klazzics Vol. 2 (Evolution: Duets And Remixes) (clean version)
>
> Or should the explicit/clean be left out and put in the annotation?
>

I don't know if we have a rule about this, but IMO these are different
versions of the tracks (and of the releases) and should be recorded in MB as
such.

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20071023/3d207231/attachment.htm