[mb-users] A cute idea

[artysmokes]

Lauri Watts wrote:
> 
> On 9/16/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think it was the point, but I don't think it addresses it. The
>> correcting
>> edit will change the release, not the original edit. Even if it is an
>> auto-edit. Currently, if I enter a new edit to correct an old one, once
>> the
>> edit is applied, I see the change in the release. But the original edit
>> still contains the error.
> 
> No, it doesn't.  If you enter such an edit now, and it gets through
> voting before the original add has been passed (or if you're an
> autoeditor doing it, so it's approved immediately), then when looking
> at the original edit, the corrected data shows immediately.
> <SNIP>
> -- 
> Lauri Watts
> 
Track edits (open ones) are highlighted in yellow if you are looking at the
AddRelease Edit, so I tend to look at those before voting on the Add. I
liked the "cute idea", and welcome it being added if necessary, but I think
that votes don't go awry if someone correcting track details has left a note
saying "I'm voting YES, as I'm fixing track details in edits ##### - #####".
If someone's voted NO to the Add, they are likely to change their mind if
they see someone is fixing the release.
--
Cheers, Arty

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-cute-idea-tf4441175s2885.html#a12708588
Sent from the Musicbrainz - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.