[mb-users] Why do we have a "X Has Picture at Y" relationship?

[Aaron Cooper]

On 9/20/07, Oliver Charles <oliver.g.charles at googlemail.com> wrote:
> True, but on the artist page redesign, whatever we decide we are most
> likely going to have an artist picture at some point – surely we need
> some way to decide what this artwork is? Last.fm has a picture
> section, and they don't have billions of pictures, because crap ones
> get rejected by voting.

We have no guidelines for this AR currently.  If we are allowing
subjective voting based on the question "Would this be a good picture
to represent the artist?" then I don't think these edits should be
included with regular edits.  No one wants an assortment of failed
edits because others thought the pictures weren't "good" enough, do
we?

Are we going to allow all voters to define what they think is "good"
or offer some guidelines such as minimum size, quality, etc.?

-Aaron