[mb-users] additional CoverArt AR necessary?

[Philipp Wolfer]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Lauri Watts <krazykiwi at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Philipp Wolfer <phw at rubyforge.org>
> wrote:
> > 1. A CC license AR is *not* a cover art AR. They are semantically
> completely
> > different. You can't logically derive a cover art from a license URL.
> That
> > it is possible in some cases is irrelevant.
> ...
>  What would be ideal imho:
>
> User need only enter: 'Release has a CD Baby page at'
>
> ...
> So I'm on the side of  "yes we should have separate AR's", but I don't
> think we necessarily should expose that to the users.
>
> Computers are supposed to help make things easier, after all.


That's what I said in point 5: The problem  are not the  different ARs, it's
basically just an user interface issue. I completely agree that it should be
easier to add those AR in a way you describe it.

-- 
Philipp Wolfer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20080417/688881b9/attachment.htm