[mb-users] interesting case: EMI Electrola/Records/Chrysalis
chris at whenironsattack.com
Sun Apr 20 22:57:20 UTC 2008
looks like EMI Electrola, licensed from Nix Checking People Records
(or they've just left that label name for 'vanity' reasons), so EMI
Electrola are the label, i think.
2008/4/20 Johannes Dewender <brainz at jonnyjd.net>:
> I have a difficult case for finding the definitive label in
> The images of the cover are available at
> from the edit notes:
> > We have a logo of Nix Checking People Records, a label which
> definetely produced AB before, but we also have an EMI Electrola logo
> and an EMI? cat#, which was not on the other Nix Checking releases.
> (and no Nix Checking cat#, like in other releases)
> > However, we also have a Labelcode LC 0542 which has this entry on
> wikipedia: EMI / Chrysalis Records Ltd. which has also an entry in MB,
> but again another LC.
> > I found out that LC 0542 is noted for EMI Records on MB, but this
> doesn't mean that we should use this as label, since the marking says
> rather EMI Electrola (which as an entry in MB).
> For me, this is too much of confusion. I like to have small independent
> labels with short and pregnant cat# (like JPK 28 for JKP) and only one
> corresponding Labelcode ;-)
> If somebody has some experience with EMI, I would be interested what
> label we should put in the release event and a reasoning why. This is
> not high priority of course, but I am willing to learn.
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
More information about the MusicBrainz-users