[mb-users] Classical editor to the rescue (again)

[Philip Jägenstedt]

Actually, I pointed it out to the editor which didn't seem confused at
all about it, if we fix this release I think (s)he will be as happy as
if we don't.

Philip

On 2/26/08, Frederic Da Vitoria <davitofrg at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Brian Schweitzer
> <brian.brianschweitzer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > >  [snip]
> > >  > For the "fixing", are we doing this according to CSG? Who are you
> going to
> > >  > use as track artist here, I don't think you could say you'll use the
> > >  > performer for track and the composer for tracks 9 to 15 !
> > >  >
> > >  Hmm, that's how I would do it? ARs for performers, as usual.
> >
> > Me too - the context ought to not matter.  Otherwise, every soundtrack
> > and classical compilation would become a mess... Otherwise, John
> > Williams would be the track artist for the Imperial Death March on a
> > Star Wars soundtrack, but 'random orchestra' would be the track artist
> > on a compilation that happened to include the Imperial Death March.
> >
>
> Ok. It does have some kind of logic in it... I'll probably never own this
> release anyhow, so I don't really care :-) Although I may have somewhere a
> release with a similar mix of genres. But I suppose you all agree this will
> seem very strange to a newbie and ridiculous to someone who does not
> understand the classical / non classical dichotomy.
>
> --
> Frederic Da Vitoria
> _______________________________________________
>  MusicBrainz-users mailing list
>  MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>