[mb-users] [unknown date]

[Rob Keeney]

That would be OK too. I'm guessing the database schema requires a
date. It's probably easier to implement leaving it blank (null value)
than entering a non-numeric value, such as [unknown date].

Another possible suggestion for an immediate work-around would be to
agree on a fictitious year that would be known to imply [unknown],
such as 1899 or 1600 (or pick one). Does anyone know if there's a
limit to how early the release year can be?

Rob.................
P84

On Jan 10, 2008 2:57 PM, Chris B <chris at whenironsattack.com> wrote:
>


> definitely needed, though i'd sooner we were just allowed to add
> labels/cat#s/etc without dates, rather than having to enter [unknown
> date] or that coming up when we don't enter a date - i think it would
> be better to just be blank (apologies if that was your intention!).
>