[mb-users] [unknown date]

[Oliver Charles]

> If we're going to use a fake year as a bogus year, then lets pick
> something that actually IS bogus, rather than picking something that's
> just not frequently actually valid.  Say, 9999?

This seems to make more sense, I would hope that we've actually fixed
the problem by then ;) I'm not sure if the db can actually hold years
that high however. 2020 should be enough.