[mb-users] Feedback/testing: track merging
Philip Jägenstedt
philip at foolip.org
Mon Mar 17 09:51:47 UTC 2008
I'm not clear on the details, but think that the track name and track
length should be a property of the album and not the common object.
The name shouldn't be the same on tranl{iter}ated Pseudo-Releases and
the length way very well differ by a few seconds due to different gap
lengths on the CD.
Philip
On 3/17/08, Aaron Cooper <cooperaa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16-Mar-08, at 5:37 PM, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > over the last two weekends I've done a little mb_server code
> > refactoring
> > and put together some old code, which implements "track merging" -
> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/TrackMerging. I'd like to ask you for
> > feedback, especially about the issues listed on the wiki page, but
> > also
> > for testing on http://tests.musicbrainz.org/ (tracks can be merged
> > from
> > the new "Tracks" page). The code is very far from finished, and so
> > expect many things to be broken for now. But still, if you find
> > something that doesn't work, please send a mail about it here, because
> > those non-functional parts are usually also the ones that need
> > discussion.
>
>
> Right off the bat I want to say this looks like a lot of fun! I
> haven't had much time to play with it because I just got home from
> Iron Maiden's concert in Toronto and I've got to get *some* sleep
> before work tomorrow! Here are some of my early observations:
>
> 1. Merges aren't auto-edits for AutoEditors. I think they could be
> and I personally would like to be able to merge without a vote.
>
> 2. Merges don't select a "destination" track by default. I assume the
> only reason we pick one is so that we pick the correct spelling of the
> track title. I hope in most cases our titles are consistent so it
> would save a click if we had the first track selected by default.
>
> 3. I think each track could use some context on the Tracks page.
> Maybe list the album name in another column so we can look at that to
> see maybe "Ah, this is their demo, so a different track." or "This is
> a live recording, I shouldn't merge this with the studio recording."
> Speaking of live recordings...
>
> 4. I assume we will not be merging different recordings together so
> the TracksMerging is not the same as works lists. Is TracksMerging a
> step towards creating TrackMasters?
>
> 5. If we're now going to be working with track masters, we will
> probably need some way to disambiguate between the main studio
> recording of a song (say Enter Sandman) and the 200~ live versions on
> bootlegs. On the Tracks page we're going to have 201~ tracks that say
> "Enter Sandman" and we won't want them merged. Is listing the
> associated album names beside the track group enough?
>
> In case anyone is interested, I've put in a number of Merge Tracks
> edits for In Flames (http://test.musicbrainz.org/mod/search/results.html?artist_type=3&artist_id=10984&orderby=desc
> ).
>
> Nice work, Lukáš!
>
>
> -Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>
More information about the MusicBrainz-users
mailing list