[mb-users] Displaying recording & work relationships on release pages
jargon at molb.org
Fri Aug 26 06:00:37 UTC 2011
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 07:48:18AM +0200, Aurélien Mino wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 12:26 AM, Johannes Weißl wrote:
> > You can say what you want against Discogs, but they have readable liner
> > notes (I have the idea for the hybrid solution from their pages), e.g.:
> > http://www.discogs.com/release/2354298
> > http://www.discogs.com/release/1398321
> A bit off topic, but there's no magic on Discogs side (and I have
> nothing against it, and the contrary): credits are entered manually.
> When you edit a release you either enter credit directly on track level
> or in a global credits section.
Yes, I know... but I think it would be great if we could come up with an
algorithm that formats the credits similar to a human (= Discogs).
Maybe it is hard to come up with a 100% perfect solution, but I'm sure a
few heuristics can yield a really good result!
More information about the MusicBrainz-users