[Playlist] collection syntax
dabrown at yahoo-inc.com
Mon Mar 22 17:33:58 UTC 2004
I like the rdf:Collection example. I say we use this because like you guys
said it's more straightforward and makes parsing much easier.
Regarding other changes:
- What is this "attribution" node about?
- Do we really want this foaf: stuff? I think it adds unneeded complexity to
nodes which really don't tell you more about the playlist itself. Why not
just use an rdf:about attribute in the dc:creator node for the playlist
author? Otherwise programs will have to support parsing the foaf nodes and
associated data just to get a link to some webpage that is only tangentially
related to the playlist itself.
From: Lucas Gonze [mailto:lgonze at panix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 8:47 AM
To: New playlist format discussion
Subject: Re: [Playlist] collection syntax
On Sunday, Mar 21, 2004, at 21:47 America/New_York, Kevin Marks wrote:
> I don't mean to sound argumentative, but what is wrong with plain <li>
> </li> ?
> The _n syntax looks fragile to me.
Dan posted a new version using the new rdf:parseType="Collection"
syntax instead of Seq/li elements. Much cleaner, much less verbose.
Check it out at:
Playlist mailing list
Playlist at lists.musicbrainz.org
More information about the Playlist