[Playlist] collection syntax
lgonze at panix.com
Mon Mar 22 18:26:28 UTC 2004
On Monday, Mar 22, 2004, at 12:33 America/New_York, Brown, Dave wrote:
> I like the rdf:Collection example. I say we use this because like you
> said it's more straightforward and makes parsing much easier.
I like it too. A lot less verbose and easier to use.
> Regarding other changes:
> - What is this "attribution" node about?
That's something I pulled in from the CC SMIL recommendation. It is
used to track parentage of a modified document, which is needed when
the license requires attribution.
> - Do we really want this foaf: stuff? I think it adds unneeded
> complexity to
> nodes which really don't tell you more about the playlist itself. Why
> just use an rdf:about attribute in the dc:creator node for the playlist
> author? Otherwise programs will have to support parsing the foaf nodes
> associated data just to get a link to some webpage that is only
> related to the playlist itself.
I need to think about this more. I don't really know how much extra
trouble and functionality it creates. Anybody else have a feeling
about FOAF one way or the other?
More information about the Playlist