[Playlist] spec comments
matt at mafr.de
Tue Jun 28 06:42:03 UTC 2005
On Monday, 2005-06-27, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> Bjorn Wijers wrote:
>> playlist element 'link' description
>> track element 'link' description
> I agree that this is an omission.
> Thoughts on just copying over the cardinality notes from 18.104.22.168.11 to
> "xspf:playlist elements MAY contain zero or more link elements."
Sure, the schemas have it that way already.
> The architectural problem with track metadata is that things like
> license/ song title/ band name have to do with stuff not intrinsic to
> the playlist. An XSPF document has its own integrity, in the sense that
> you can be certain about it being well-formed and valid, so an XSPF
> reader can infer that the author of the playlist had the right to make a
> statement about its own licensing status. That's not true for external
> stuff which the playlist points to.
I remember we thought about adding a license element on the track level
but we realised that we'd need licensing information for each location
More information about the Playlist