[Playlist] New "valid XSPF" button proposal

[Sebastian Pipping]

Chris Anderson wrote:
> I'm a little confused as to what "playlist 2.0" refers to. I'm
> starting to accept the 2.0 moniker for "Web" and even "Music" but I
> think the primary thing it stands for is vague hype. Maybe the word
> "valid" would go a little farther toward spreading the right ideas -
> plus keep people who push invalid xspf (hypem.com,
> projectplaylist.com, etc) from using it..

---------------------------------------------------------------
I agree its more a hype thing than precise information.
I also agree the word "valid" would be good in there.

I came to "Playlist 2.0" because
* in a way it is and will be part of the new web
* I tried several other slogans before.

Among the former candidates were thing like
* "Validity matters" (too long, not for non-geeks
* "Valid playlist" (too long)
* "For playlists" (as in for president, looks like voting not valid)
* "Play valid" (grammatically incorrect?, playlist/content mixed up)

If anybody knows a better slogan please let me
know so we can check if it works.
---------------------------------------------------------------



> I'm very particular about pixel-level details, so feel free to ignore
> me, but I think the XSPF text would look stronger if not for the
> slight shadow on the P and F's vertical strokes, and the tiny serifs
> on the S.

-------------------------------------------------------
I'll check if I can further tune this.
-------------------------------------------------------



> The only other detail I might play with is the underscore's overlap
> with the red border. Maybe it would look more solid if the underscore
> didn't cut into the border. Or maybe not - just something I'd try.

-------------------------------------------------------
Will give it a try.

Thanks to all for the feedback!



Sebastian